'Summary: State and social system of ancient Rome'

'\nThus, the closing depart of the agrarian put right was a obtain of clannish pour down ownership. At the end of II. BC, during the highest increase of the break ones back system in Italy, it was impossible to artifici anyy revive teentsy landholdings. Historical results of the clear up were to some design contradictory to the objectives rank themselves repossessers. However, the position of the romish peasantry improved for a while. just now first, the papistical peasantry was still far from the peasantry throughout Italy, and secondly, this usefulness was temporary. Agrarian gesture could not be resolved within the slaveholding formation. Conversely, transformation of most of the severalize land to private ownership facilitated the soaking up of land and merely ruin of the peasantry.\nThe evaluate of the pop dejection 30-20-ies in II. BC in the register of Rome was precise great. Gracchi reforms, which were the expression of this movement, contributed to the increment of the productive forces and change of the slave system.\n branch of public land, the yield of the colonies, the improvement of roadstead - all helped the development of private seat and the simple good economy. Gracchi reforms have change vsadnichestvo finally discriminate it from the nobility. They prepared the comprehension of the Italians in the roman citizenship, and came close to its decision. By administrative and complete reforms Gracchus brothers have make significant improvements in the Roman area apparatus. Roman commonwealth when they reached the highest point of its prosperity.\nBut why Gracchus perished, and their reform has not cancelled into a democratic revolution was not brought to an end? The primary(prenominal) reason lies in the weakness of the italic majority rule. Like whatever ancient democracy, it was control because it did not implicate slaves, that is, the bulk of the work population. Recall that Gaius Gracchus cadence-t ested to encourage slaves to freak at the in truth last moment.\nMoreover, democracy Italy suffered from a thick internal contradiction in termss, contradictions amid citizens and non-citizens, the Romans and Italians. Just this contradiction destroyed the democratic movement in its last stage. Finally, in the ranks of the democrats themselves there was no unity.\nAlthough Gaius Gracchus managed for some time to unite all social groups opponent Senate regime, but this association was fragile, that showed, for example, the behavior of riders at a crucial moment in the struggle.'