Psychology Behind Supreme Court Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Psychology Behind imperative act Case - Essay Examplewas in the parentage of vending drugs in the school premises. After conducting this assay and accruing much incriminating and objectionable try out in the purse of T.L.O., the vice principal contacted the appropriate regimen and T.L.O. was subsequently arrested by them.T.L.O. sought to suppress the evidence recovered by the school politics at her trial, claiming that this violated her Fourth Amendment rights pertaining to infatuated search. The school governance did say that they had a reasonable reason to conduct this search. Hence T.L.O.s motion was totally denied by the concerned court and this evidence recovered by the school authorities was declared admissible in the court of law. Following her time on the basis of the evidence recovered by school authorities from her purse, T.L.O. appealed against her in the New Jersey Supreme Court, citing the same reason that the search conducted by the school authorities violated her Fourth Amendment Rights (Slobogin 207). The New Jersey Supreme Court concluded that the search was indeed unreasonable and consequently reversed the conviction of T.L.O., setting her free. The state of New Jersey appealed against the reversal of T.L.O.s conviction in the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the evidence of New Jersey, by a resounding margin of 6-3, declaring that the search conducted by the school authorities was reasoned and thereby the exclusionary principle did not apply to the evidence presented against T.L.O.While delving on the psychology behind this Supreme Case, it does need to be mentioned that the Supreme Court thoroughly considered the claims of all the stakeholders in this particular case. The honorable Court did say that the students in the high school do have the right of privacy against unreasonable search as enshrined in the Fourth Amendment. Yet, the court did acknowledge that when it comes to the constitutional rights of the children and