Patrick Henry Vs Martin Luther King Jr. Essay

Patrick atomic number 1 and Martin Luther King Jr. were two of the closely influential revolutionarys known to mankind. Even though their views on how to become liberated were exclusively opposite, their passion and unrelenting determination eventually proved to be rewarding. Patrick Henry and Martin Luther King Jr. ar as the sun and water competitivenessing for the same withering blossom but with different methods to success.Patrick Henry had an in disco biscuitse, win big or lose big approach to freedom. In his speech he is invoke to the president to open his eyes and notice that everything is not apt. Henry was telling the president there was no peaceful manner of settling this dispute with Great Britain. They tried to solve their differences by talking for ten years, Henry said, but to no avail. According to Henry, there was nothing left to do but vex for their freedoms. He said, If we wish to be free-if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so eagle-eyed contending-if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so massive engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight I repeat it, sir, we must fight. He yearned for freedom so desperately he was will to die for it. Give me liberty, or give me death.Martin Luther King Jr. was just as fiery for freedom as Patrick Henry was, but his approach was different. He devised a more passive invent to lift his oppression. He was very unwavering in his non-violent beliefs. His philosophy was that ferocity only brings momentary results. strength only starts a circle of endless chaos. He believed you must offset hatred with love. In hallow to progress something has to be gained. When violence is present nothing is gained, therefore, in order to progress you will get hold of to use non-violent tactics.Patrick and Martin had many differences. They have different policies in which they followed to overcome cruelty. They also had different types of oppression. Martin was dealing with racial issue and Patrick was dealingwith governmental issues. Martin was a peaceful, non-violent problem solver and Patrick wasnt getting any results universe nonviolent so he became violent. These two men also have some things in common. They both(prenominal) had a strong belief in God. They both had been under heavy subjugation. They both fought the oppressor, although with different means of force, both were successful.These two great men help shape our country in to what it is today. Whether by violence or non-violent acts both overcame the harsh realities of life. Without their sacrifices where would we as a people be today?